|
PEACE AND
CONFLICT STUDIES |
INTRODUCTION
The essay should allow the student to develop
and show research, interpretative and presentation skills. It
should allow the student to concentrate his/her studies on an
area of interest and produce a piece of work of academic merit.
CHOICE OF TOPIC
The choice of topic must be such as to ensure
that the various assessment criteria can be satisfied. Avoid topics
that are too broad in scope. There are many areas of human interaction
in which Conflict and/or Peace can be observed, but purely descriptive
essays should be avoided. Topics drawn from more dynamic situations
allow the process of change to be studied and the candidate to
assess the viability of Peace being achieved or maintained. When
choosing a topic, ensure that a variety of sources is available.
Candidates may use journalistic or visual/pictorial material or
data collected from interviews, but there essays should not be
based soley on such sources.
TREATMENT OF THE TOPIC
The subject involves differing interpretations
of situations, events, causes and solutions. The better essays
will examine a wide variety of opinions, assess their good and
bad points, and include an element of personal evaluation. Many
essays will involve topics in which the student has direct experience
via family and friends, such as the two Koreas. This is not discouraged
but, in such cases, care must be exercised to maintain the academic
standards of essay writing, particularly with reference to sources,
contentious issues and conclusions. Peace and Conflict is an interdisciplinary
subject, and essays should reflect this by drawing data from,
and integrating it with, statistics, geography, psychology, sociology,
history, economics, politics and journalism.
- The following examples are intended as guidance
only.
-
- The debate on the effects of television
violence on pre-teenagers: social and legislative safeguards
and their effectiveness is better
than Violence on TV.
-
- Racism in x and proposals for its reduction
is better than A study of racism.
-
- ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
| J |
To what extent does
the candidate place the topic within a wide understanding of
Peace in society? |
| Achievement Level |
|
|
0 |
The candidate provides
no contextual understanding. |
|
1 |
The candidate provides
little, inappropriate, or too much contextual understanding. |
|
2 |
The candidate provides
a fair description of the context of the topic. |
|
3 |
The candidate provides
an appropriate description of the context of the topic. |
-
| K |
To what extent does
the candidate demonstrate knowledge and understanding of theories
about the causes of peace and conflict? |
| Achievement Level |
|
|
0 |
The candidate does not
examine the relevant theories about the causes of peace and conflict. |
|
1 |
The candidate demonstrates
only limited knowledge and understanding of theories about the
causes of peace and conflict. |
|
2 |
The candidate demonstrates
a satisfactory knowledge and understanding of theories about
the causes of peace and conflict. |
|
3 |
The candidate demonstrates
a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of theories about
the causes of peace and conflict. |
| L |
To what extent does
the candidate demonstrate awareness and understanding of the
differing roles, interpretations, and actions of all conflicting
parties? |
| Achievement Level |
|
|
0 |
The candidate makes no
attempt to understand the roles, interpretation and action of
the conflicting parties, or substantially misrepresents them. |
|
1 |
The candidate demonstrates
little awareness of the differing roles, interpretations and
actions of all conflicting parties, and fails to reach well informed
and substantiated opinions about them. |
|
2 |
The candidate demonstrates
satisfactory awareness of the differing roles, interpretations
and actions of all conflicting parties, and shows some ability
to reach well informed and substantiated opinions about them. |
|
3 |
The candidate demonstrates
a sound grasp of the differing roles, interpretations and actions
of all conflicting parties, and reaches well informed and substantiated
opinions about them. |
| M |
To what
extent does the candidate examine solutions to conflict situations? |
| Achievement
Level |
|
|
0 |
The candidate
makes no attempt to examine possible solutions to conflict situations. |
|
1 |
The candidate
demonstrates only limited ability to examine possible solutions
to conflict situations. |
|
2 |
The candidate
demonstrates a satisfactory ability to examine possible solutions
to conflict situations. |
|
3 |
The candidate
presents a clear and realistic examination of possible solutions
to conflict situations. |
-